Post-New Hampshire Primary Commentary
by Vickie Karp, PR Director, VoteRescue & National Chair Coalition for Visible Ballots
The New Hampshire primary took place this past Tuesday, but it is far from over.
Evidence of highly suspicious counting anomalies and likely election fraud has been coming in ever since the 8th, and it appears to have been pervasive on both the Republican and Democratic sides.
Look at the phenomenally amazing statistics on Obama and Hillary, comparing the percentages each got in the optical scan-counted counties (Diebold) vs. the counties with hand-counted paper ballots. This analysis was done by Bruce O'Dell of the Election Defense Alliance, together with Theron Horton, an election reform activist from New Mexico:
Clinton Optical scan: 91,717, 52.95% Obama Optical scan: 81,495, 47.05%
Clinton Hand-Counted 20,889, 47.05% Obama Hand-Counted 23,509, 52.95%
Quoting Bruce: "The percentages appear to be swapped, and seem highly unusual".
By the way, these are the same Diebold Optical Scan Counters as shown hacked in minutes by Black Box Voting's "hacking team" in the 2007 Emmy award nominated documentary, "Hacking Democracy". Then there's the YouTube video that was posted, I believe, today, showing the website of the Boston Globe on election night, where they had posted totals for each of the "towns" in New Hampshire for all of the Republican candidates. Ron Paul's numbers town by town are enormously high, in the several hundred to over a thousand range in some cases; but the totals at the bottom show him with almost 70,000 votes less than McCain, whose column was next to his and whose individual totals rarely exceeded a one digit number. Here is the link:
The company who is programming the Diebold Opscans is LHS, and Bev Harris has done her usual brilliant job of digging into who is behind this company. She produced a great YouTube regarding the principals, one of whom was convicted of cocaine trafficking and is a convicted felon.... LHS programmed and "counted" 80% of the state's ballots in New Hampshire, and will do the same for the primaries in the states of Connecticut, Maine, Vermont and Massachusetts
and for more on that, you can read this BradBlog story:
As Bev Harris reported on Alex Jones' radio show yesterday, she investigated the town of Sutton, New Hampshire, where an entire family of four had voted for Ron Paul, yet the town showed "zero" votes for him. After contacting Jennifer Call, the Town Clerk, Bev was told that "human error" had been responsible for not carrying over all of the totals correctly to the final tally sheet, and that in reality, Ron Paul had received 31 votes. This of course calls into question what occurred in many other "towns" where Ron Paul's official totals showed "zero".
At around 6pm this evening, January 10th, Dennis Kucinich announced that he was filing for a recount in New Hampshire. I am uncertain at this time if that will apply only to the Democratic side, or for the entire election. Ron Paul supporters across the country are calling for Dr. Paul to also demand a recount, given the apparent evidence of his questionable totals.
The deadline to file for a recount is noon tomorrow, Friday the 11th...
If you are in the Austin, Texas area, join the VoteRescue mailing list at www.voterescue.org and become an Exit Poll volunteer for our upcoming November 4th primary. Other actions: Check in at www.blackboxvoting.org to see what you can do when it's Primary Day in your state; check in at www.libertybroadcastnetwork.org if you want to monitor a primary in another state from your PC at home; check in at www.ronpaulvotecount.com if you are a Ron Paul supporter who wants to start an affidavit campaign for the primary in your state.
This is what the founders meant when they said that the price of liberty is eternal vigilance. I'm almost afraid to go to sleep.
Vickie Karp, PR Director, VoteRescue National Chair, Coalition for Visible Ballots Co-Editor, "HACKED! High Tech Election Theft in America"
|